<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>It's Fixed in the Next Release - Mundanity</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/</link>
    <description>Observations on Everything</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.0.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:58:03 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Plug for SpeedTest.net, Raspberry for Bell (revised)</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/144-Plug-for-SpeedTest.net,-Raspberry-for-Bell-revised.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/144-Plug-for-SpeedTest.net,-Raspberry-for-Bell-revised.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=144</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=144</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    [Updated: watch my line speed improve over time!]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There&#039;s not much to say, these numbers speak for themselves. I figure I&#039;m about 3Km from the nearest CO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=300&amp;amp;entry_id=144&quot; title=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.speedtest.net&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net/result/553752533.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=300&amp;amp;entry_id=144&quot; title=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.speedtest.net&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net/result/553753883.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I lied 121ms pings?? Give me a BREAK!&lt;br /&gt;
I may just give up on DSL.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey my line went dead for about half an hour today (no dial tone even) and look:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=300&amp;amp;entry_id=144&quot; title=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.speedtest.net&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net/result/632708913.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Moving from &quot;effectively non-functional&quot; to &quot;pathetic&quot; Way to go.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More news... 7:40 on a Saturday morning, and &lt;strong&gt;finally&lt;/strong&gt; things seem to be up to par:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=300&amp;amp;entry_id=144&quot; title=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.speedtest.net&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net/result/643205586.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=300&amp;amp;entry_id=144&quot; title=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.speedtest.net&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.speedtest.net/result/643214647.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Now we know the connection is definitely up to snuff, although the ping times are a little pathetic. The next question is how well does this hold up during peak demand. Even though the line isn&#039;t shared, there&#039;s network hardware at the other end that needs to keep up with peak loads. We&#039;ll see...&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:53:18 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/144-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Nigerian Style Fraud Via Facebook</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/137-Nigerian-Style-Fraud-Via-Facebook.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/137-Nigerian-Style-Fraud-Via-Facebook.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=137</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=137</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Since my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=280&amp;amp;entry_id=137&quot; title=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/54-And-now...-Nigerian-Style-Fraud-via-Skype!.html&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/54-And-now...-Nigerian-Style-Fraud-via-Skype!.html&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;Skype Fraud post&lt;/a&gt; is one of the most popular here, I thought I&#039;d throw in a few references to some other similar tricks. This one is particularly funny:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=281&amp;amp;entry_id=137&quot; title=&quot;http://consumerist.com/5263537/bad-luck-facebook-scammer-you-picked-a-target-who-reads-consumerist&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://consumerist.com/5263537/bad-luck-facebook-scammer-you-picked-a-target-who-reads-consumerist&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;Bad Luck Facebook Scammer, You Picked A Target Who Reads Consumerist&lt;/a&gt; with the wonderful phrase &quot;Once I deposit the funds, you can print it out of any colour printer and it&#039;s real money!&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then there&#039;s the original article referenced in the one above: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=282&amp;amp;entry_id=137&quot; title=&quot;http://consumerist.com/5260397/nigerian-scammers-break-into-your-gmail-ask-your-friends-for-money&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://consumerist.com/5260397/nigerian-scammers-break-into-your-gmail-ask-your-friends-for-money&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;Nigerian Scammers Break Into Your Gmail, Ask Your Friends For Money&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can only hope that one of these days the scammers just go out of business because everyone has enough information to spot them and waste their time. Not likely, but one can hope. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:17:08 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/137-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Is the &quot;Astronautics/astrospace&quot; Definition of Professional in Wiktionary?</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/125-Is-the-Astronauticsastrospace-Definition-of-Professional-in-Wiktionary.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/125-Is-the-Astronauticsastrospace-Definition-of-Professional-in-Wiktionary.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=125</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=125</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Possibly the Internet&#039;s most valuable contribution to society is it&#039;s ability to foster dialogue. Unfortunately that dialogue is frequently not constructive. Among the least constructive techniques is the &quot;attack and run&quot; method, because there really is no way to control another person&#039;s ability to communicate. The attacked person merely opens another channel. This is a case in point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier today, the nameless writer behind a seemingly useful site, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=272&amp;amp;entry_id=125&quot; title=&quot;http://www.space.gs/&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.space.gs/&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot; &gt;http://www.space.gs/&lt;/a&gt;, known as &quot;Astronautics&quot; (formerly &quot;astrospace&quot;) on Twitter, decided to communicate information about a mail server security problem. He or she posted several tweets on the subject (many now absent). This is the remaining one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Astronautics: JSC mail server may have been hacked. If you get an HSFNEWS email from NASA check that the urls in the email are not Chinese&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Then some time later, this tweet:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Astronautics: I lost many followers making that public service announcement - it&#039;s strange how so many people have no sense of duty.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I thought I&#039;d offer an explanation. Honestly I thought I was polite:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;alan_langford: @Astronautics You assume all your followers are affected and/or can&#039;t recognize spam. You flooded twitter with what amounts to noise. Not good&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just in case, I added (fixed a typo):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;alan_langford: @Astronautics I happen to think your &quot;regular&quot; feed is interesting enough to tolerate the odd lapse, but obviously not everyone else does.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The public response was:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Astronautics: I do my duty and make public service announcements. I make a difference. I will not bend to court popularity.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Which is all well and good, but it seemed to me that the author was trying to understand why many followers left, which is unrelated to one&#039;s sense of duty. Maybe it was my sense of duty to try to offer an explanation in the first place. Then I got this rather shocking direct message:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;DM from Astronautics: It is not a &#039;lapse&#039; and I do not care what some loser like you thinks. I am a professional journalist with a sense of DUTY. Go to hell.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The individual subsequently blocked me, removing the opportunity to respond as well as depriving me of his &quot;journalistic&quot; feed and forcing me to respond in a public way. I suppose in hindsight that&#039;s not much of a loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So here&#039;s &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; response: this person is clearly using a definition of &quot;professional&quot; with which I am not familiar. Maybe I&#039;m out of touch. If anyone has a link to a credible reference that lists name calling, not identifying yourself, and telling people to &quot;go to Hell&quot; as professional, please send it to me. Considering the increasing meaninglessness of &quot;professional&quot; when attached to &quot;journalist&quot;, I am now questioning the credibility of anything on this site. That&#039;s too bad, because credible news on space and astronomy would have been a good thing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img style=&quot;border: 0px; padding: 4px;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/uploads/twitter_astrospace-cropped-2009-01-21.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;screenshot&quot; /&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:58:56 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/125-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Malware Injection: More Fun With Skype</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/97-Malware-Injection-More-Fun-With-Skype.html</link>
            <category>Internet Technology</category>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/97-Malware-Injection-More-Fun-With-Skype.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=97</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=97</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_right&quot; style=&quot;width: 110px&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_img&quot;&gt;&lt;img width=&quot;110&quot; height=&quot;102&quot; src=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/uploads/irony.serendipityThumb.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_txt&quot;&gt;Skype screen capture&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This one probably isn&#039;t new, but it&#039;s worth noting. An associate recently got this bogus &quot;security warning&quot;. Appropriately named &quot;irony&quot;, the message warns the user that &quot;Security Center has detected Malware&quot; and directs the user to a site where they can download a patch. Click on the image for a full sized version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &quot;patch&quot; will install malware on the user&#039;s computer. At least they can&#039;t forge the link as belonging to Microsoft, but this could easily fool an unsuspecting user. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:43:15 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/97-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>The Single Best Way to Bust a Telephone Scam</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/94-The-Single-Best-Way-to-Bust-a-Telephone-Scam.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/94-The-Single-Best-Way-to-Bust-a-Telephone-Scam.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=94</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=94</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    This is simple and effective. If you suspect that the company who is calling you is not legitimate, ask the caller for their web site address.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the call is a fraud attempt, the &quot;agent&quot; probably won&#039;t be able to give it to you. One of these things will happen:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;They won&#039;t &quot;remember&quot; it. For extra bonus fun, ask them if their sales manager knows it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;They&#039;ll give you a legitimate site that isn&#039;t theirs. Ask them to hold on while you pop it up. If that doesn&#039;t make them hang up, ask them where the information relating to their offer is. They might tell you it&#039;s an exclusive offer that&#039;s not available on the web, but if the site has nothing that seems to be related to the offer, it&#039;s a big warning that they&#039;re not telling the truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;They&#039;ll give you a fake site that is theirs. This would be pretty stupid on their part, since it would provide the authorities with a path back to them. Do a search on the site to see what the world has to say about them. If they&#039;re not in the search index, then the site was probably set up a few days ago. More sophisticated users can do a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=195&amp;amp;entry_id=94&quot; title=&quot;http://www.canacweb.com/domain.php?action=whois&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.canacweb.com/domain.php?action=whois&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot; &gt;whois lookup&lt;/a&gt; on them... look at the registration date. Also if the site owner is masked for privacy, you can be sure it&#039;s not a large established company. Either way, report the site to your local authorities as soon as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These fraud schemes depend on leaving the smallest possible trail back to them. Legitimate businesses want to open as many possible channels of communication with their potential customers as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it&#039;s as easy as this: no web site equals no legitimacy. Protect yourself. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:57:06 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/94-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Criminalize False Caller-ID Messages</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/82-Criminalize-False-Caller-ID-Messages.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/82-Criminalize-False-Caller-ID-Messages.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=82</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=82</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Here&#039;s a crime for modern times: make the transmission of an intentionally false Caller-ID message a minor criminal offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There&#039;s an established mechanism for blocking identity through caller ID, namely the &quot;Private Number&quot; message. Therefore the only conceivable use of false information is to mislead the person being called. Most of the fraudulent calls I receive use bogus, rather than private numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But what should the penalty be? How about something proportional to the impact on the victim? In and of itself, direct victim impact is pretty small, so how about &lt;em&gt;three hours in jail per occurrence&lt;/em&gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What, you say that&#039;s ridiculously low? Well then how about this: mandatory consecutive terms, no concurrent sentences. Fraudsters have to make a large number of calls in order to find victims (see footnote). Three hours in jail works out to about a year for every three thousand calls. These guys need to make tens of thousands of calls a day, so in a month or so they could easily rack up a sentence in excess of their entire lifespan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A slap on the wrist for people who flirt with the idea, major hard time for the fraudsters. Works for me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Footnote: One operation I led on started with an automated dialler, transfered to a &quot;qualifier&quot; who made sure I had a credit card, and then transfered to a &quot;closer&quot;, who was none too thrilled when I finally admitted that I was deliberately wasting their time, eight minutes in. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:37:45 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/82-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>About this Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/81-About-this-Blog.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/81-About-this-Blog.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=81</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=81</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;strong&gt;Observations on Everything&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although &quot;It&#039;s Fixed in the Next Release&quot; is a mantra from software development (or rather technical support), the intent here is to apply the phrase to a broader context, for example, &quot;It&#039;s fixed in my next reincarnation.&quot; This broad interpretation means that the entries here cover vastly unrelated subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you&#039;re looking for a tightly focused blog with short, pithy entries, you are in the wrong place (although there are some). Here, blogging is about content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have done one thing to make things easier on non-technical readers. All of my comments that deal with specific aspects of software development are in a category that doesn&#039;t show up in the main list. you have to select &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=286&amp;amp;entry_id=81&quot; title=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/categories/17-Its-a-Code,-Code-World&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/categories/17-Its-a-Code,-Code-World&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;It&#039;s a Code, Code World&lt;/a&gt; to see these posts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:23:28 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/81-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>And now... Nigerian Style Fraud via Skype!</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/54-And-now...-Nigerian-Style-Fraud-via-Skype!.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/54-And-now...-Nigerian-Style-Fraud-via-Skype!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=54</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=54</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    The great thing about Skype is that people can get in touch with you from just about anywhere, and that can lead to great friendships and business. The not so great thing is that any dork from anywhere on the planet can use this same convenience to rip people off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here&#039;s a message I received today: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/54-And-now...-Nigerian-Style-Fraud-via-Skype!.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;And now... Nigerian Style Fraud via Skype!&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:17:55 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/54-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Credit Card Scam of the Day: Interest Rate Reduction</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/52-Credit-Card-Scam-of-the-Day-Interest-Rate-Reduction.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/52-Credit-Card-Scam-of-the-Day-Interest-Rate-Reduction.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=52</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=52</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    The fun thing about organized criminal credit card fraudsters is that they always have to stay a step ahead. I guess people were starting to catch on to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=158&amp;amp;entry_id=52&quot; title=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/46-Credit-Card-Fraud-Its-Time-for-Banks-to-Play-Offence.html&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/46-Credit-Card-Fraud-Its-Time-for-Banks-to-Play-Offence.html&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Free&amp;quot; Vacation&lt;/a&gt; scam, so they had to come up with a new one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today I got to hear it for the first time. It&#039;s so simple it&#039;s brilliant. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/52-Credit-Card-Scam-of-the-Day-Interest-Rate-Reduction.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Credit Card Scam of the Day: Interest Rate Reduction&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:52:02 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/52-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Credit Card Fraud: It's Time for Banks to Play Offence</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/46-Credit-Card-Fraud-Its-Time-for-Banks-to-Play-Offence.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/46-Credit-Card-Fraud-Its-Time-for-Banks-to-Play-Offence.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=46</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=46</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Every once in a while organized crime gives me a call. It&#039;s not that I&#039;m so special, they just happen to know my phone number. The call comes in &quot;Unknown number&quot; which is a warning sign in itself. Then I&#039;ve won a trip to Florida, Vegas, or wherever. Red flag. Press nine and you get a very happy and enthusiastic person who wants to give you a free trip, all you have to do is be a credit card holder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stop right there. These people are offering you great sounding (and nonexistent) stuff for the sole purpose of capturing your name and credit card number so they can rip you off. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/46-Credit-Card-Fraud-Its-Time-for-Banks-to-Play-Offence.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Credit Card Fraud: It&#039;s Time for Banks to Play Offence&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:00:49 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/46-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Missing Payee on Image-Ready Cheques with Quicken XG 2007 (Rev 2)</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/35-Missing-Payee-on-Image-Ready-Cheques-with-Quicken-XG-2007-Rev-2.html</link>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
            <category>Technology</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/35-Missing-Payee-on-Image-Ready-Cheques-with-Quicken-XG-2007-Rev-2.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=35</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=35</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I apologize for the title of this post, it should be &quot;another reason to hate proprietary software&quot;, but I&#039;m hoping to save some other poor soul a week of trouble.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is: &lt;strong&gt;make sure that the first line of the address field is exactly the same as the payee name, and presto.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now the whole story: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/35-Missing-Payee-on-Image-Ready-Cheques-with-Quicken-XG-2007-Rev-2.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Missing Payee on Image-Ready Cheques with Quicken XG 2007 (Rev 2)&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:06:14 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/35-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Bye Bye Blogger!</title>
    <link>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/18-Bye-Bye-Blogger!.html</link>
            <category>Business</category>
            <category>Google</category>
            <category>Mundanity</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/18-Bye-Bye-Blogger!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/wfwcomment.php?cid=18</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=18</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alan Langford)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Okay so it&#039;s been a long time since I&#039;ve made a post here. There&#039;s lots of reasons for that, but one of them has been that I just couldn&#039;t tolerate Blogger anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After looking at a variety of solutions, I finally stumbled upon Serendipity (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/exit.php?url_id=67&amp;amp;entry_id=18&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.s9y.org&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;  title=&quot;Serendipity Blog Software Site&quot;&gt;www.s9y.org&lt;/a&gt;), and it looks like it&#039;s going to do the job very well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There&#039;s still a few things to take care of, a few broken links and style tweaks to get into place, but it was easy to install, fairly easy to extract data from Blogger, and it generates decent HTML.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We&#039;re back in business! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 00:18:35 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambitonline.com/nextrelease/archives/18-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>